Water Projects

House Roll Call Vote 377

2005 Scorecard Vote

Pro-environment vote

Yes

Votes For

105

Votes Against

315

Not Voting

13

Conservationists have long fought the costly and environmentally destructive “pork barrel” water projects administered by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. One of the most egregious recent examples is a $1.8 billion expansion of locks and dams on the Upper Mississippi and Illinois rivers–the most expensive inland navigation project ever conceived.

The project was justified by its supporters as a way of handling projected increases in barge traffic. However, studies by the National Academy of Sciences and the Congressional Research Service show that river traffic has been flat or declining for 25 years, with that trend likely to continue. The proposed project, in addition to damaging aquatic ecosystems, would displace funding for critically needed restoration efforts in the Upper Mississippi River, coastal Louisiana, the Everglades, and the Great Lakes.

The lock expansion was included in H.R. 2864, the Water Resources Development Act, an omnibus bill for water projects. Representatives Floyd Flake (R-AZ) and Earl Blumenauer (D-OR) offered a common-sense amendment that would have required the Corps to show that river traffic was increasing before the project could be authorized. On July 14, 2005, House Amendment 450 was rejected by a 105-315 vote (House roll call vote 377). YES is the pro-environment vote. The omnibus bill passed the House shortly afterward. At press time, a companion Senate bill had yet to be approved.

Votes

Show
Show
Export data (CSV)
  • Pro-environment vote
  • Anti-environment Vote
  • Missed Vote
  • Excused
  • Not Applicable

Vote Key

Sort by
Alabama
2024 State Scorecard Average

15%

Alaska
2024 State Scorecard Average

58%

Arizona
2024 State Scorecard Average

30%

Arkansas
2024 State Scorecard Average

4%

California
2024 State Scorecard Average

75%

Colorado
2024 State Scorecard Average

52%

Connecticut
2024 State Scorecard Average

97%

Delaware
2024 State Scorecard Average

100%

Florida
2024 State Scorecard Average

30%

Georgia
2024 State Scorecard Average

35%

Hawaii
2024 State Scorecard Average

98%

Idaho
2024 State Scorecard Average

5%

Illinois
2024 State Scorecard Average

81%

Indiana
2024 State Scorecard Average

24%

Iowa
2024 State Scorecard Average

5%

Kansas
2024 State Scorecard Average

25%

Kentucky
2024 State Scorecard Average

20%

Louisiana
2024 State Scorecard Average

21%

Maine
2024 State Scorecard Average

71%

Maryland
2024 State Scorecard Average

83%

Massachusetts
2024 State Scorecard Average

96%

Michigan
2024 State Scorecard Average

54%

Minnesota
2024 State Scorecard Average

47%

Mississippi
2024 State Scorecard Average

24%

Missouri
2024 State Scorecard Average

21%

Montana
2024 State Scorecard Average

2%

Nebraska
2024 State Scorecard Average

4%

Nevada
2024 State Scorecard Average

72%

New Hampshire
2024 State Scorecard Average

88%

New Jersey
2024 State Scorecard Average

78%

New Mexico
2024 State Scorecard Average

94%

New York
2024 State Scorecard Average

63%

North Carolina
2024 State Scorecard Average

47%

North Dakota
2024 State Scorecard Average

0%

Ohio
2024 State Scorecard Average

33%

Oklahoma
2024 State Scorecard Average

3%

Oregon
2024 State Scorecard Average

68%

Pennsylvania
2024 State Scorecard Average

56%

Rhode Island
2024 State Scorecard Average

100%

South Carolina
2024 State Scorecard Average

17%

South Dakota
2024 State Scorecard Average

0%

Tennessee
2024 State Scorecard Average

13%

Texas
2024 State Scorecard Average

33%

Utah
2024 State Scorecard Average

6%

Vermont
2024 State Scorecard Average

100%

Virginia
2024 State Scorecard Average

55%

Washington
2024 State Scorecard Average

72%

West Virginia
2024 State Scorecard Average

0%

Wisconsin
2024 State Scorecard Average

24%

Wyoming
2024 State Scorecard Average

3%