Nuclear Pork Barrel

Senate Roll Call Vote 175

1994 Scorecard Vote

Pro-environment vote

No

Votes For

52

Votes Against

46

Not Voting

2

Despite massive government subsidies, the U.S. nuclear power industry has failed to solve its serious economic, safety, and waste disposal problems and, as a result, no successful order for a new commercial nuclear reactor has been placed in over 15 years.

Federal subsidies for nuclear power continue, however. Over the last few years, for example, the Department of Energy has spent millions on a program to develop an Advanced Liquid Metal Reactor (ALMR), using breeder reactor technology.

Many environmentalists note that, like many past nuclear power projects, the ALMR is economically unjustifiable and suffers from serious safety flaws. They say the ALMR will generate more high-level radioactive waste than it will consume and could increase the supply of plutonium. The critics’ views are supported by a 1991 Department of Energy report, which ranked 23 energy technologies on the basis of economic and energy potential, environmental impact, and technical risk: the ALMR received the third worst ranking.

When the Fiscal Year 1995 Energy and Water Appropriations bill (H.R. 4506) came to the Senate floor, Sen. John Kerry (D-MA) offered an amendment to terminate the ALMR. Sen. J. Bennett Johnston (D-LA) offered a motion to table (kill) the Kerry amendment and keep the ALMR program alive.

On June 30, 1994, the Senate accepted the Johnston tabling motion by a vote of 52 – 46. NO is the pro-environment vote.

In a significant victory for the environment, the ALMR was eventually terminated after the House voted against funding the project (see House vote 18).

Votes

Show Options
Show
Export data (CSV)
  • Pro-environment Vote
  • Anti-environment Vote
  • Missed Vote
  • Excused
  • Not Applicable

Vote Key

Sort by
Alabama
1994 Scorecard Average

6%

Alaska
1994 Scorecard Average

9%

Arizona
1994 Scorecard Average

88%

Arkansas
1994 Scorecard Average

6%

California
1994 Scorecard Average

92%

Colorado
1994 Scorecard Average

94%

Connecticut
1994 Scorecard Average

100%

Delaware
1994 Scorecard Average

94%

Florida
1994 Scorecard Average

0%

Georgia
1994 Scorecard Average

97%

Hawaii
1994 Scorecard Average

97%

Idaho
1994 Scorecard Average

6%

Illinois
1994 Scorecard Average

94%

Indiana
1994 Scorecard Average

6%

Iowa
1994 Scorecard Average

6%

Kansas
1994 Scorecard Average

6%

Kentucky
1994 Scorecard Average

9%

Louisiana
1994 Scorecard Average

9%

Maine
1994 Scorecard Average

47%

Maryland
1994 Scorecard Average

100%

Massachusetts
1994 Scorecard Average

100%

Michigan
1994 Scorecard Average

94%

Minnesota
1994 Scorecard Average

97%

Mississippi
1994 Scorecard Average

6%

Missouri
1994 Scorecard Average

0%

Montana
1994 Scorecard Average

41%

Nebraska
1994 Scorecard Average

3%

Nevada
1994 Scorecard Average

94%

New Hampshire
1994 Scorecard Average

88%

New Jersey
1994 Scorecard Average

100%

New Mexico
1994 Scorecard Average

100%

New York
1994 Scorecard Average

97%

North Carolina
1994 Scorecard Average

3%

North Dakota
1994 Scorecard Average

6%

Ohio
1994 Scorecard Average

44%

Oklahoma
1994 Scorecard Average

6%

Oregon
1994 Scorecard Average

100%

Pennsylvania
1994 Scorecard Average

90%

Rhode Island
1994 Scorecard Average

97%

South Carolina
1994 Scorecard Average

6%

South Dakota
1994 Scorecard Average

6%

Tennessee
1994 Scorecard Average

3%

Texas
1994 Scorecard Average

6%

Utah
1994 Scorecard Average

9%

Vermont
1994 Scorecard Average

97%

Virginia
1994 Scorecard Average

100%

Washington
1994 Scorecard Average

97%

West Virginia
1994 Scorecard Average

16%

Wisconsin
1994 Scorecard Average

50%

Wyoming
1994 Scorecard Average

3%