Environmental Funding

Senate Roll Call Vote 142

2008 Scorecard Vote

Pro-environment vote

Yes

Votes For

48

Votes Against

45

Not Voting

7

Issues

The Congressional budget process begins once the President’s annual budget is submitted in February. At that time, Congress begins to develop its own budget plan that reflects its spending priorities. The federal budget resolution sets funding levels for the next fiscal year and sets forth budget totals for the next five years.

Because the concurrent budget resolution determines the spending authority of House appropriation committees that then subdivide the amount among its subcommittees, the federal budget is a powerful tool for establishing national policy priorities. Programs that protect our air, water, climate, wildlife, parks, forest, refuges, and other public lands fall under the Interior-Environment Appropriation Committee.

S. Con. Res. 70 marks the second year of reversing cuts to many important environmental and conservation programs that occurred for nearly a decade. The budget agreement provides $38.6 billion in FY 2009 discretionary spending for environment and natural resources programs. This funding level is $1.9 billion above the FY 2008 enacted level, and $3.9 billion over the President’s FY 2009 request. The resolution also provides $7.7 billion for energy programs in FY 2009, which is $2.8 billion above the President’s proposal. This is a major improvement over the years of depleting funding for important public lands and natural resource management.

YES IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. As a concurrent resolution, the bill does not need the President’s signature. On June 4, the Senate passed S. Con. Res. 70, by a vote of 48-45 (Senate roll call vote 142), setting the congressional budget for fiscal year 2009.

Votes

Show Options
Show
Export data (CSV)
  • Pro-environment Vote
  • Anti-environment Vote
  • Missed Vote
  • Excused
  • Not Applicable

Vote Key

Sort by
Alabama
2008 Scorecard Average

6%

Alaska
2008 Scorecard Average

9%

Arizona
2008 Scorecard Average

88%

Arkansas
2008 Scorecard Average

6%

California
2008 Scorecard Average

92%

Colorado
2008 Scorecard Average

94%

Connecticut
2008 Scorecard Average

100%

Delaware
2008 Scorecard Average

94%

Florida
2008 Scorecard Average

0%

Georgia
2008 Scorecard Average

97%

Hawaii
2008 Scorecard Average

97%

Idaho
2008 Scorecard Average

6%

Illinois
2008 Scorecard Average

94%

Indiana
2008 Scorecard Average

6%

Iowa
2008 Scorecard Average

6%

Kansas
2008 Scorecard Average

6%

Kentucky
2008 Scorecard Average

9%

Louisiana
2008 Scorecard Average

9%

Maine
2008 Scorecard Average

47%

Maryland
2008 Scorecard Average

100%

Massachusetts
2008 Scorecard Average

100%

Michigan
2008 Scorecard Average

94%

Minnesota
2008 Scorecard Average

97%

Mississippi
2008 Scorecard Average

6%

Missouri
2008 Scorecard Average

0%

Montana
2008 Scorecard Average

41%

Nebraska
2008 Scorecard Average

3%

Nevada
2008 Scorecard Average

94%

New Hampshire
2008 Scorecard Average

88%

New Jersey
2008 Scorecard Average

100%

New Mexico
2008 Scorecard Average

100%

New York
2008 Scorecard Average

97%

North Carolina
2008 Scorecard Average

3%

North Dakota
2008 Scorecard Average

6%

Ohio
2008 Scorecard Average

44%

Oklahoma
2008 Scorecard Average

6%

Oregon
2008 Scorecard Average

100%

Pennsylvania
2008 Scorecard Average

90%

Rhode Island
2008 Scorecard Average

97%

South Carolina
2008 Scorecard Average

6%

South Dakota
2008 Scorecard Average

6%

Tennessee
2008 Scorecard Average

3%

Texas
2008 Scorecard Average

6%

Utah
2008 Scorecard Average

9%

Vermont
2008 Scorecard Average

97%

Virginia
2008 Scorecard Average

100%

Washington
2008 Scorecard Average

97%

West Virginia
2008 Scorecard Average

16%

Wisconsin
2008 Scorecard Average

50%

Wyoming
2008 Scorecard Average

3%